Around the year 1940, Isaac Asimov established the Three Laws of Robotics, a hierarchical set of guidelines in which the robot in his stories was obliged to obey. These rules were more than business guidelines for fantastic machines; it is a set of ethics that is largely reflected by humanity.
The first law
“A robot cannot hurt a human being, either due to inertia, to allow a man to be abused. This is the most vital of the laws, and establishes a very stable basis for the other two laws. This explains the underlying causes of fear in mankind from the unnatural, the mechanical and the non-organic.
For a long time, people have lived without electronics, which exist in man-made environments. Although most computers or machines are not organizations under any part of the definition, our mind conceptually perceives logic processing as a biological method, and computers have that in the overwhelming amount. A cobot, for example, is very close to the high level of logic and methods of biological. They have these rudimentary obstacles that people see as the point of separation between us, these machines, and that has given rise to the fear of machines. This fear usually causes it is from the realization that we are not in control of our destiny and our fellow humans. Usually, people see machines as devices that were created only to serve us.
Although this is acceptable to most of the specifications under the present conditions, the whole situation is inversely activated when the sensibility of the robot thinking is introduced. When they approach the value that makes mankind unique among all the creatures of the earth, we begin to fear that our usefulness will be reduced. One of the greatest fears among mankind is the fear of having no reason to exist, of being something there is only for the sake of the existing ones.
By creating this first law, Asimov shows a keen understanding of this concept and an overwhelming denial of human civilization to reject scientific progress for the sake of maintaining his own identity.
The second law
“A robot must obey the commandments given to him by human beings, unless the orders conflict with the first law.” This is a logical extension of the first law, allowing people to have the robot’s greatest control. Without it, robots could easily have been stubborn, totally useless metal and silicon creations that serve no purpose at all. With the creation of the robots, people have historically expected some kind of supply services. A robot built without a specific purpose is, in the current mindset, a useless robot.
The Third Law
“A robot must protect its existence, as long as such protection does not conflictwith the first or second law. This law clearly reflects the nature of the animals and humans, and it also confirms the animal’s existence of the robots. All creatures are” programmed “with a specific goal in mind: self-preservation, be it a long or short duration. , almost all animals exhibit a symbiotic existence with their environment, the most obvious exception to humanity.This relationship allows the further existence of a species in the long term, and so is a substantive law to be introduced to robotics. The dead robots were to surrender to a form of death; it would only be if they were ordered to apply it in accordance with the hierarchical order of laws.
This law demonstrates the fact that humans are, in fact, animals, and as such they focus on a great degree of self-preservation. This is ultimately the law that mankind creates for robots, although it is sensuality in a very insightful way for which Asimov was infamous. On a flat surface, the law protects the interests of the people, in particular, ensures the continuation of the existence of robotics.
The Three Laws of Robotics can externally look like a very human trick to ensure that their creations will continue to serve many human interests, but it is also obvious that these laws reflect very strongly, with our own human existence. Essentially, the Laws confirm that sentient robots are much more than a system a cable and processors, confirmingthat sentient robots are as human as any of us.
